Login
Galenson, E., Roiphe, H. (1976). Some Suggested Revisions Concerning Early Female Development. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 24S:29-57.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1976). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 24S:29-57

Some Suggested Revisions Concerning Early Female Development

Eleanor Galenson, M.D. and Herman Roiphe, M.D. Author Information

The research upon which this paper is based was carried out in the Research Nursery in the Division of Child Psychiatry at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. We wish to acknowledge the important contributions of the many staff members to this work, particularly Dr. Jan Drucker, who assisted in data analysis, and Ms. Catherine Shapiro, head teacher, who has been responsible for the functioning of the Nursery for the past five years.

ARE-EVALUATION OF FREUD'S IDEAS concerning early sexuality must take into account new findings from a variety of sources, such as studies of normal children, genetically and hormonally deviant ones, and those who are emotionally disturbed, as well as the changes in psychoanalytic thinking that have taken place under the impact of ego psychology over the past twenty years. We agree with Lichtenstein (1961) that sexuality has been relegated to the position of only one among several variables from the special and exemplary role in development that Freud (1905), (1940) had originally assigned to the sexual drive organization. Lichtenstein, in arguing against this general trend, maintains that sexuality is the most archaic mode, closely related to the primary process and therefore uniquely capable of conveying the emotional truth of personal existence, while only later on do other modes establish, in thought, th conception that one does in fact exist. In this respect, he follows Freud's views concerning the centrality of sexuality among the other variables of

- 29 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.