Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To review The Language of Psycho-Analysis…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Prior to searching a specific psychoanalytic concept, you may first want to review The Language of Psycho-Analysis written by Laplanche & Pontalis. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Holzman, P.S. (1985). Psychoanalysis: Is the Therapy Destroying the Science. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33:725-770.

(1985). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 33:725-770

Psychoanalysis: Is the Therapy Destroying the Science Related Papers

Philip S. Holzman, Ph.D.

MANY READERS WILL RECOGNIZE THAT THE TITLE of this paper comes from a passage in The Question of Lay Analysis. Freud (1926) wrote that monograph on the occasion of defending Theodore Reik, a nonmedical analyst then practicing in Vienna, against a charge of quackery. There Freud vigorously championed his own view that psychoanalysis was not a medical discipline, although its origins lay in neurology. In the postscript to the monograph, written in 1927, he argued that origin is not a criterion for judging the current status of a discipline. The theory of electricity, he observed, had its beginnings in observations of nerve-muscle preparations, yet it would be absurd today to regard it as a part of physiology. And, further, although radiology has a medical application, it is surely part of physics.


[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.