Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article.  Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Coco, J.M. (2002). Freud, Leonardo Da Vinci, and The Vulture's Tail: A Refreshing Look At Leonardo's Sexuality.: Wayne Andersen New York: Other Press, 2001, 256 pp., $48.00 hardcover, $22.00 paperback. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 50(4):1375-1383.

(2002). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 50(4):1375-1383

Freud, Leonardo Da Vinci, and The Vulture's Tail: A Refreshing Look At Leonardo's Sexuality.: Wayne Andersen New York: Other Press, 2001, 256 pp., $48.00 hardcover, $22.00 paperback

Review by:
Janice M. Coco

Every so many years, new scholarship emerges to reawaken the controversy engendered by Freud's 1910 analysis of Leonardo da Vinci. Wayne Andersen's Freud, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Vulture's Tail revisits this intellectual fray with a remarkable intensity, as the author works through the various competing theories, including that of Freud. Andersen attempts to untangle the “mare's nest” that has been made of Leonardo's words and sexual identity (pp. 4, 24).

Readers who over the years have followed the trajectory of criticism elicited by Freud's infamous error will perhaps be put off by the rehashing of events implied by Andersen's title. Nevertheless, the author extends the already complex literature, offering an alternative explanation of the artist's sexuality and reexamining Freud's counter-transference in relation to Leonardo. For this reason, it is a worthy book for those interested in the practice and origins of applied psychoanalysis in the arts. Inasmuch as the validity of psychobiography has been challenged by art historians for ignoring crucial art historical evidence and, in turn, by psychoanalysts for the frequent lack of a living (or cooperative) analysand, it seems that the interdisciplinarian risks incurring the antagonism of both disciplines. In the specific instance of Freud's Leonardo, most authors have favored one discipline at the expense of the other; consequently, most of the ongoing criticism has been aimed not so much at conclusions as at methodology. Theoretically, it appears that psychoanalysis and art history are frequently at odds with each other, even though the creative process inherent to the practices of artmaking and therapy is potentially the same. As an art historian versed in psychoanalytic theory, Andersen casts a critical eye in both directions.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.