Login
Bacciagaluppi, M. (1996). Guilt According To Erich Fromm. Contemp. Psychoanal., 32:455-462.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1996). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32:455-462

Guilt According To Erich Fromm

Marco Bacciagaluppi, M.D. Author Information

In the early forties, Erich Fromm was central to the development of the interpersonal-cultural school of psychoanalysis. Later, he was less directly involved in shaping the further course of psychoanalysis. On the other hand, recent developments show a more than superficial—although little-noticed—affinity with some of Fromm's views. In this article I compare Fromm's views on the subject of guilt with some of the more recent theoretical and empirical contributions in this area. I suggest that many of these developments were anticipated by Fromm, but that his contributions have not received due recognition. On the other hand, some of his concepts need to be modified in the light of later research.

As in most of Fromm's work, his contribution in this area is mainly formulated in theoretical terms. An integration of Fromm's theoretical concepts with later developments could have clinical relevance by leading to an alternative framework within which to organize our clinical data regarding aggressiveness and guilt.

Guilt According to Fromm

In what I consider to be possibly his central work, Man for Himself (1947), Fromm drew a fundamental distinction between authoritarian and humanistic conscience. He later went back to this distinction in an extended version of a 1969 essay, which may be read in the German edition of Fromm's complete works (the only one existing to date) (Fromm, 1980-1981, vol. 8). The following passages are quoted from Man for Himself. All italics are Fromm's.

According to Fromm, “the authoritarian conscience is the voice of an internalized external authority” (p. 148), and corresponds to what Freud

—————————————

1 This article is a revision of a paper presented to the “Erich Fromm International Symposium” in Florence (Italy), November 14-16, 1986. The Proceedings were published under the title Incontro con Erich Fromm by Edizioni Medicea, Firenze 1988.

0010-7530/96 $2.00 + .05

Copyright © 1996 W. A. W. Institute

20 W. 74th Street, New York, NY 10023

All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1996)

- 455 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.