|Fortune, C. (1988). A Dark Science: Women, Sexuality and Psychiatry in the Nineteenth Century, by Jeffrey M. Masson, New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1986, 199 pages, $15.95. Free Associations, 1:130-134.|
Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.
If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.
If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.
(1988). Free Associations, 1(12):130-134
A Dark Science: Women, Sexuality and Psychiatry in the Nineteenth Century, by Jeffrey M. Masson, New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1986, 199 pages, $15.95
Jeffrey Masson's controversial critique of and its origins, The Assault on Truth: Freud's Suppression of the Seduction Theory (see review by ), attempted to show through original documents that Freud denied the of sexual assault on women. In his new book — a collection of nine translations of French and German medical papers from 1865 to 1900, with a lengthy introduction —
- 130 -
Masson delves even further back for evidence to muster a broader attack on present-day in general.
In the introduction, he charges that extreme Victorian therapeutic attitudes towards women and their remain central to psychotherapeutic practice today. Women (and children), he claims, are not only abused, but made to feel guilty through the approach of ‘blaming the victim’. He also contends that women, particularly, continue to be brutalized by surgery, drugs and electroshock — the tools of modern medical psychiatric treatment.
Masson culls a narrow range of papers, including a number of shocking examples of sanctioned nineteenth-century medical malpractice. His authors are essentially minor figures of European psychiatric thought.
Given these inherent limitations, Masson's collected papers cannot carry the burden of proof for his broad argument indicting modern psychotherapeutic attitudes. By taking a sensational and sweeping approach to the serious, issue of therapeutic attitudes, he stands to alienate
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]