North, R. (1931). Law and the Modern Mind: By Jerome Frank. (New York: Brentano's, 1930. Pp. 362. Price 21 s.). Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 12:506-507.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1931). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 12:506-507

Law and the Modern Mind: By Jerome Frank. (New York: Brentano's, 1930. Pp. 362. Price 21 s.)

Review by: Roger North

The idea that law is fixed and unchangeable, rather than fluid and

- 506 -

changing, is a 'basic myth' due to the law's position in the community as a father-substitute. This is the theme developed here by Mr. Frank. He discusses interesting questions such as legal verbiage, the judging process, fictions, and the jury, but although modern psychological ideas, chiefly derived from the works of Piaget on children, are made much use of, the book is chiefly written from the point of view of academical jurisprudence, and for this reason fails to deal adequately with the psychological aspect of its material. Mr. Frank is chiefly concerned to develop a mature realistic attitude which regards the law as being in a state of continual flux and is the antithesis of the attitude which clings to the myth referred to above. With this end in view he quotes and criticizes a large number of eminent jurists whose writings have borne on the subject; to such an extent, in fact, that his work

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2010, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.