Pedder, J.R. (1976). Attachment and New Beginning—Some Links Between the Work of Mich... Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 3:491-497.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1976). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 3:491-497

Attachment and New Beginning—Some Links Between the Work of Michael Bálint and John Bowlby

J. R. Pedder Author Information

BACKGROUND

Bowlby's definitive three volume work (1969), (1973 et seq.) crowns a lifetime's researches into the early and late effects of childhood separation. He has recently (Bowlby, 1975) summarized this work. In his reconsideration of instinct theory he argues that attachment behaviour should be 'conceived as a class of behaviour that is distinct from feeding behaviour and sexual behaviour and of at least as equal significance in human life'. He considers the 'most likely function of attachment behaviour is protection, mainly from predators' and therefore crucial to the survival of the species.

Bowlby's work has been criticized (e.g. Engel, 1971)for discarding the dynamic and economic points of view and not adequately distinguishing psychological from behavioural frames of reference. However, as Matte-Blanco (1971) more favourably comments, 'its impact upon ideas regarding the psychobiological foundations of psychoanalysis is bound to be great'. It is suggested here

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2009, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.