Bell, A.I. (1965). The Significance of Scrotal Sac and Testicles for the Prepuberty Male. Psychoanal Q., 34:182-206.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1965). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 34:182-206

The Significance of Scrotal Sac and Testicles for the Prepuberty Male


Anita I. Bell, M.D. Author Information

Psychoanalysis seems to have neglected the psychological importance of the scrotal sac and testicles at certain periods in the life of the male. These periods include the pregenital, prepubertal, and pubertal phases. (The time of the male climacteric is another such period but will not be discussed here.) Of these phases, prepuberty will chiefly concern us in the present paper.

Unfortunately, as Spiegel (18) has remarked, little has been written about prepuberty, especially in boys; most writers refer to it vaguely as part of adolescence. Anna Freud (10), Blos (6), and Aichhorn (1) take note of the quantitative and qualitative changes in the drives that cause a disturbance in the distribution of internal forces at puberty; there is a resurgence of pregenital gratification in consequence. But even a definition of prepuberty in the boy is lacking. Most case reports designate him as adolescent after eleven and make no mention of his physiological development. Some of this co

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2010, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.