Login
Gottschalk, L.A., Fronczek, J., Abel, L. (1993). Emotions, Defenses, Coping Mechanisms, and Symptoms. Psychoanal. Psychol., 10:237-260.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1993). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 10:237-260

Emotions, Defenses, Coping Mechanisms, and Symptoms

Louis A. Gottschalk, M.D., Ph.D. , Janny Fronczek, M.A. and Lennart Abel, M.S. Author Information

Empirical research on affects and their defenses has not progressed much beyond the clinical psychoanalytic treatment paradigm initiated by Freud. Recently there has been renewed interest in trying to reach a consensus on the definitions of defenses and in achieving their reliable measurement with subjects within and outside the psychoanalytic situation. One method of measuring defenses that focuses on the major data of observation of psychoanalysis—namely, speech—is the Gottschalk-Gleser (1969) method of content analysis. This article report on a study using this method to examine 5-min samples of speech elicited from six different groups of individuals via purposely ambiguous standardized instructions simulating the request to free-associate. The purpose of this research was to determine how the magnitude of self-acknowledged anxiety and the defenses of anxiety displacement and anxiety denial relate to each other and to a variety of other factors, such as age, sex, intelligence, degree of mental disorder, magnitude of various kinds of hostility, and state of consciousness. The findings indicate that displacements and denials in mentally healthy individuals are more likely to function as coping mechanisms in contrast to their function as defenses or symptoms in mentally disordered people.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.