Login
Dean, E.S. (1964-65). A Psychotherapeutic Investigation of Nagging. Psychoanal. Rev., 51D:15-21.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1964-65). Psychoanalytic Review, 51D:15-21

A Psychotherapeutic Investigation of Nagging

Edward S. Dean, M.D. Author Information

Nagging individuals are often found to be weak, insecure, and fearful. Their nagging disguises a basic feeling of weakness and provides an illusion of power and superiority. Such are the conclusions that one draws when seeing nagging persons in psychotherapy.

For these individuals sometimes do seek psychiatric treatment. They often complain of anxiety, depression, nervousness, and instability. Rarely do they speak of themselves as given to nagging. This problem only gradually becomes apparent to a therapist. One should refrain from using this term in speaking with patients—unless it has become acceptable to the patient—because its invidious implications have a harmful effect on the therapeutic relationship.

Nagging is a word derived from the Scandinavian nagga, meaning to gnaw. From the Latin we have captiousness, of which Dr. Samuel Johnson1 has said, “…Captiousness is commonly the resentment of negative injuries, or offences of omission, of which the ill intention cannot be proved, and should therefore very rarely be supposed …”

This “resentment of negative injuries” is prominent in nagging. For nagging has a tone of complaint, sometimes mounting to anger. And the nagging person usually attributes his resentment to some failure by another to live up to principles of good conduct. These negligences call forth a resentment that is justified logically by an appeal to general principles. “But it is the principle of the thing” is the exclamation one so often hears from nagging persons.

One is inclined to suspect the sincerity of this resentment. Perhaps

- 15 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.