Login
Keen, E. (1973-74). Suicide and Self-Deception. Psychoanal. Rev., 60:575-585.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1973-74). Psychoanalytic Review, 60:575-585

Suicide and Self-Deception

Ernest Keen, Ph.D. Author Information

Introduction

The possibility of suicide makes existentialists of us all. In suicide, existence is at stake, and the character of human existence is that suicide is always a possibility—for ourselves, our friends, and our patients.

To see suicide as a human possibility is to see it very differently from the way our culture would have us see it: as a disease, a crime, at best an unfortunate accident. To see suicide as a possibility instead of such an eventuality is to orient ourselves toward ourselves, our friends, and our patients in a particular way. It is to see man as possibility instead of eventuality.

To see man as possibility is common among the treatment professions, such as when we speak of the responsibility patients must take in their own getting well. When the issue is a life decision a patient must make, we are likely to see him as possibility; but when the issue is a death decision a patient may make, that is, suicide, our courage fails us and the patient becomes for us less than a man. He becomes a disease, a management problem, a professional embarrassment. Our thinking about suicide, then, is often plagued by an inconsistency born of our unwillingness to resist cultural precriptions and to face death and suicide as characteristic and essential possibilities of being human at all.

If we take seriously that man is possibility and that suicide is an ever-present possibility, then it is absolutely necessary for the treatment professions to face squarely the issue of when to intervene to prevent a suicide and when not to. Is there a way to consistently

- 575 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.