Login
Hunter, D. (1988). Doubling, Mythic Difference, and the Scapegoating of Female Power in MACBETH. Psychoanal. Rev., 75:129-152.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1988). Psychoanalytic Review, 75:129-152

Doubling, Mythic Difference, and the Scapegoating of Female Power in MACBETH

Dianne Hunter, Ph.D. Author Information

Psychoanalytic literary criticism has often been attacked as ahistori-cal. But the new historicism in Renaissance studies, coupled with recent feminist analyses of gender as a social construction, provide a multifaceted context for illuminating literary texts as ideological responses to and creations of the social fabric from which they are woven. In its double status as both recurrent archetype and ideological construct, myth provides a particularly rich array of topics for discussing the social texture of literature.

Fusing psychoanalytic feminist with contextual criticism, this essay examines the analogies between psychological dynamics and political processes in Shakespeare's Macbeth. My argument is that Macbeth sacralizes the difference between succession by primogeniture and succession by assassination, though the play's rhetorical and structural doublings dissolve that very difference. This paradox allows us to see the play as a myth in the structuralist sense as a mediator of unwelcome cultural contradictions, in particular, the tension between political hierarchy and the facts of life—between the politics of maintaining an ordered system of differences and the biological fact that succession involves the dissolution of the very differences hierarchy seeks to uphold among persons, sexes, and generations. What makes Macbeth tragic is that its ideology of succession requires an oedipal scapegoat; and what makes the play a patriarchal myth is that its imagery associates the dissolution of differences that inheres in father-son succession with illegitimate violence, preoedipal fluidity, and sterile female power.

Through scapegoating female powers in the form of demonized

- 129 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.