Hamilton, J.W. (2001). “Nothing Specific, Nothing Human”: The Life And Work Of Pie... Psychoanal. Rev., 88:337-367.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(2001). Psychoanalytic Review, 88:337-367

“Nothing Specific, Nothing Human”: The Life And Work Of Piet Mondrian

James W. Hamilton, M.D. Author Information

The pathogenicity of childhood primal scene observation has been a controversial issue in psychoanalytic thinking. Greenacre (1973) believed that the witnessing of parental intercourse as well as the birth of a sibling or a miscarriage in the first years can thwart drive development, evoking primitive denial along with isolation of affect, rationalization, and displacement to bolster repression as a lifelong method of dealing with such early trauma. This defensive constellation promotes a defective sense of reality and, in certain instances, the formation of an “illusory wall” that reduces external stimuli and the risk of losing control of libidinal and aggressive impulses.

In support of these concepts, Greenacre cited the life and work of the painter Piet Mondrian as well as her own analytic cases and that of the Wolf Man. Because (1) Mondrian was so intent on keeping emotion entirely out of his art in order to achieve a pure form of abstraction with just primar

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2010, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.