Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Tomasi, B.R. (1973). The Fraternal Theme in Joyce's Ulysses. Am. Imago, 30(2):177-191.

(1973). American Imago, 30(2):177-191

The Fraternal Theme in Joyce's Ulysses

Barbara R. Tomasi

In the “Scylla and Charybdis” episode of Ulysses, Stephen expounds theoretically on the ways in which Shakespeare's art was engendered by the circumstances of his family life; his theory reaches through the novel as a loose paradigm for all of the family relationships in Ulysses. At the same time, the theory is a paradigm for the extra-familial relationships of the artist, for his precarious position in relation to society is an equally major theme of the novel. We see Stephen under attack in the library scene; A.E., Best and Eglinton are allied against him, not only as Platonists massed in opposition to his Aristotelianism, but also as fellow-poets, publishing fellow-poets whose voices are collectively the intellectual voice of Ireland. Stephen's theories are a game for them, an afternoon's diversion. They plan to meet later in the evening, but the meeting is exclusive and Stephen is not invited. The harmony of intellectual communion—, “great poet on a great brother poet” (184), which gives rise to the brilliance of Stephen's insight into Shakespeare's art, is superceded by alienation—great poet against brother poet—, and Stephen is once more set apart from his fellows.

This atmosphere of rivalry permeates Ulysses. It seems to be an inevitable outcome of the fatherless situation, whether it be the fatherless household (Penelope and Telemachus without Odysseus, Avon without Shakespeare, Eccles Street without Bloom), or the fatherless society (Ithaca without Odysseus, Denmark without the old King Hamlet, Ireland without Parnell). Freud's comment on this rivalry in Totem and Taboo, published in 1913, was therefore available to Joyce during the writing of Ulysses. He perceived it as evolving from the archetypal family relationship in which “a jealous father … keeps all the females for himself and drives away his sons as they grow up.” The “primal horde,” as Freud calls the sons, or brothers, “came together, killed and devoured their father….

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.