Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To review an author’s works published in PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Author Section is a useful way to review an author’s works published in PEP-Web. It is ordered alphabetically by the Author’s surname. After clicking the matching letter, search for the author’s full name.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rudat, W.E. (1981). Ernest Jones' Hamlet Interpretation and Nevile's Translation of Seneca's Oedipus. Am. Imago, 38(4):369-387.

(1981). American Imago, 38(4):369-387

Ernest Jones' Hamlet Interpretation and Nevile's Translation of Seneca's Oedipus

Wolfgang E. H. Rudat, Ph.D.

This article compares Shakespeare's Hamlet with one of the elaborations of the Oedipus myth, Alexander Nevile's translation of Seneca's Oedipus, published in 1581. It specifically addresses itself to J. Philip Brockbank's critique of Jones in his 1977 Shakespeare Survey article, “Hamlet the Bonesetter.” Brockbank argues: “The postulated nature of the ‘unconsciousbeing what it is, … there can be no accessible evidence to demonstrate Shakespeare's complicity, as it were, in Ernest Jones' understanding. We are left to assume some obscure collaboration between the unconscious responses of playwright, of character and of audience … I would suppose this too intimate and too non-political an interpretation of the play, and the point may be pursued further through a comparison with [Sophocles'] Oedipus Rex.”

The difficulty with Brockbank's approach is that, while it ingeniously tries to read Hamlet in terms of the ancient sacrificial tragedy which he sees represented in Oedipus Rex, it neglects textual data which might indeed suggest Shakespeare's own “complicity” in the oedipal conflict. Brockbank deals with Sophocles' version of the Oedipus myth and not with that of Seneca and his Renaissance English translators, even as he frequently makes reference to the Senecan tradition and to Seneca's Oedipus in particular.

Let us first look at the closing lines in Nevile's rendering of Seneca's play:

O cursed head: O wicked wight, whom all men deadly hate.

O

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.