Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rudnytsky, P.L. (2002). Preface. Am. Imago, 59(1):1-2.

(2002). American Imago, 59(1):1-2


Peter L. Rudnytsky

After two issues with a primary focus on the history and theory of psychoanalysis, I expect that many readers will welcome a literary respite. But since psychoanalysis is a cure by love-whether in Freud's sense of the patient's transferential love for the analyst or in Ferenczi's sense of the analyst's compassionate love for the patient-the theme of this issue remains as much psychoanalytic as it is literary.

I have arranged the four papers in part chronologically and in part according to the severity of the pathologies they dissect. Barbara Schapiro's luminous essay on Hardy's Far From the Madding Crowd (1874) is at once the most optimistic in its appreciation of the virtues as well as the dangers of “romantic idealization” and takes up the earliest of the texts in question. Humbert Humbert's pedophilia is surely at least as perverse as the sadomasochistic scenarios of Paul Sheldon and Annie Wilkes, so I allow chronology to dictate my placement of John Ingham's comprehensive mapping of Nabokov's fascination with artistic as well as sexual primal scenes in Lolita (1955) before Douglas Keesey's trenchant exposition of gender dynamics in Stephen King's Misery (1987), an iconic masterpiece of popular culture. Finally, Brady Brower takes us to the limit one more time by turning from English to French literature and reading George Bataille's surrealistic pornographic classic, The Story of the Eye (1928), with the appropriately sophisticated tools of Lacanian theory as a parable of the plight of postmodernism and of the indissoluble relation between prohibition and desire.

The two reviews in this issue will, I am sure, find a wide audience.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.