Tip: To open articles without exiting the current webpage…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
To open articles without exiting your current search or webpage, press Ctrl + Left Mouse Button while hovering over the desired link. It will open in a new Tab in your internet browser.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Pizer, S.A. (2004). Learning from Our Mistakes; Beyond Dogma in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. Patrick Casement. New York: Guilford, 2002. 144 pp. $26.00.. Am. Imago, 61(4):543-556.
(2004). American Imago, 61(4):543-556
Learning from Our Mistakes; Beyond Dogma in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. Patrick Casement. New York: Guilford, 2002. 144 pp. $26.00.
Review by: Stuart A. Pizer
Patrick Casement has written a small gem, the condensed perspective of a master meditating about clinical psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. Learning from Our Mistakes joins his earlier books as a contribution toward teaching at all levels, from psychology interns to analytic candidates. Casement's humane and user-friendly set of compass points offers wholesome grounding to trainees and yet also declares a clinical ethos pertinent to the most experienced senior analysts—and, perhaps, an important corrective to decades-old autocratic forms of psychoanalytic “training.” (As James McLaughlin has observed to me in a personal communication, his entire long career could be viewed as a recovery from his training.) True to his subtitle, Casement seeks to carry us “beyond dogma” to the heart of darkness in analytic work, where novel territory lies waiting to be discovered by analyst and patient. At this level, Casement is an eloquent and sure teacher.
This being said, I could not help but read Casement's book, in parallel, at a second level. At this second level, my imagination generates a picture of Casement organizing his thesis, with particular personal poignancy and high seriousness, around his now-famous account of his treatment of Mrs. B., published originally in 1982 and thoughtfully included at the end of this volume as an appendix. While, at the surface of Casement's argument, I find passages that strike me as elaborating, explaining, and even justifying his clinical choices with Mrs. B., the total message and spirit of this book seem to me to constitute a deep and subtle act of tacit reparation.
All of us who write and publish accounts of our own clinical work, along with our theoretical perspective or reflective musings on the analytic process, stand exposed as a “fixed figure for the time of scorn / To point its slow unmoving finger at” (Othello, 4.2.56-57).
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]