Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Drichel, S. (2018). The Disaster of Colonial Narcissism. Am. Imago, 75(3):329-364.
    

(2018). American Imago, 75(3):329-364

The Disaster of Colonial Narcissism

Simone Drichel

Narcissus's self-knowledge is an accession to a clarity that is so clear that it will not lead to relation. (Spivak, 1993, p. 32)

In her 1991 article “An Impossible Response: The Disaster of Narcissus,” Claire Nouvet notes that Maurice Blanchot includes a brief discussion of the Narcissus myth in The Writing of the Disaster. This inclusion, she says, “implicitly gives rise to a question of capital importance for our purposes: what is ‘disastrous’ in Narcissus's story?” (1991, p. 117). On one level, the answer to this question—which is of “capital importance” not just for Nouvet's but also for my own purposes in this essay on colonial narcissism—seems fairly obvious: narcissism, as the psychopathology which takes its name from “Narcissus's story,” has such a singularly bad reputation in the popular imagination that it is not difficult to fathom why someone would frame it as a “disastrous” condition. In fact, in as much as Narcissus is commonly attributed with arrogance, grandiosity, aloofness, intense self-absorption, as well as a ruthless lack of empathy for and indifference towards others, he is easily identified as a walking disaster best avoided. However, while Narcissus's disastrous impact on others is well documented, and much lamented, what is perhaps less commonly noted—at least outside the context of clinical psychoanalysis—is the utter disaster of Narcissus's own existence. This lesser-known disaster is perhaps worth a closer look, for it certainly plays a significant part in Ovid's original conception, where Narcissus is severely punished for his cold indifference and impervious air of superiority: meeting the fate predicted for him by Tiresias, Narcissus falls in love with his own reflection and dies upon thus coming to “know himself.” In fact, becoming bound to a love that can never be consummated, Ovid's Narcissus turns into what Gayatri Spivak, in her essay “Echo,” evocatively calls “an icon of mortiferous self-knowledge” (1993, p.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2015 and more current articles see the publishers official website.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.