Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device. (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).

You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ullman, M. (1964). Discussion. Am. J. Psychoanal., 24(1):26-28.
   

(1964). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 24(1):26-28

Discussion

Montague Ullman, M.D.

I find myself very much in agreement with the spirit and content of Dr. Weiss’ paper. His open, enthusiastic, receptive and respectful approach to the subject of dreaming is a welcome outlook to those of us who were never convinced that either the last word or even next to the last word had been written about the nature and meaning of dreaming in the human organism.

As he indicates, there has long existed the problem of establishing the respectability of dreaming because of the early and enduring association of interest in the dream with necromancy, magic and superstition. Later, with the development of the scientific method, there was further downgrading of such esoteric phenomena as dreaming thus relegating it to the penumbra of scientific interest and concern. Freud brought some respectability to the subject, but have his discoveries really brought a due measure of respect?

As Dr. Weiss suggests, a source of a somewhat less than whole, and perhaps less than wholesome, view of the dream has to do with the historical roots of the psychoanalytic movement itself. He points up several such influences, quite appropriately relating them to the internalization of aspects of the Victorian social milieu and their reappearance as features of classical dream theory. The dream is at least more than, if not qualitatively different from, the pictorial representation of man's struggle against his own baser nature. Not enough room was left for the appreciation of the self-reparative, the self-realizing potentials of the personality as expressed in the dream. The hydraulic model or safety valve analogy could not really do justice to the capacity for creative improvization, versatility and originality of dream symbols and their integration into a story told in metaphor.

We could add to Dr.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.