Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

de Rosis, L.E. (1964). Discussion. Am. J. Psychoanal., 24(1):43-45.

(1964). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 24(1):43-45


Louis E. de Rosis, M.D.

May's paper raises many questions. To try to discuss all of them would take more time than is allotted me in this paper. I am most interested in the question: How does the creative encounter bear upon the psychoanalytic process and the doctor-patient relationship? A truly fruitful psychotherapeutic relationship would qualify as an encounter in the sense described by Dr. May.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.