Login
Lussheimer, P. (1966). Discussion. Am. J. Psychoanal., 26:17-19.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1966). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 26:17-19

Discussion

Paul Lussheimer, M.D. Author Information

I wish to express my gratitude for the privilege of reading Professor Bally's paper and being asked to make some comments. My remarks will not be in the form of any criticism since there is hardly anything with which I would not agree. I want to limit them to the impressions the paper made on me and to the emotional reaction which it elicited.

I might quote a Latin saying that came to me while reading Professor Bally's paper: Tempora mutantur et nos mutamus in illis. Times change and we change with them. It is a paper of “Then and Now.” How was it at the beginning of the psychoanalytic movement? Seventy years ago Sigmund Freud coined the term psychoanalysis when he presented a paper at Charcot's hospital in Paris. He wanted, as Professor Bally has pointed out, psychoanalysis to be considered a natural science, and in spite of great efforts to convince his medical colleagues he was confronted with an intense and long-lasting resistance from most of his contemporaries.

In reviewing the literature on psychoanalysis which was written early in this century, one is amazed by the degree of ignorance, ill will and outspoken, evident hostility. One of the most outstanding publications of this kind was an issue of a German magazine which under the heading Gegen Psychoanalyse (Against Psychoanalysis), contained a series of anti-analytic articles, two of them written by outstanding professors of psychiatry. Times have changed and today psychoanalysis, either in its original

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.