|Grinker, R.R., Sr. (1966). “Open-System” Psychiatry. Am. J. Psychoanal., 26:115-128.|
Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.
If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.
If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.
(1966). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 26(2):115-128
When I left chicago in 1932 to undertake a personal with , I knew that Dr. had been invited by Dr. to join the faculty of the Chicago Institute for . It was, however, only during my analysis that I learned that profound differences had developed between Alexander and Horney, which culminated in her departure from the Chicago Institute and the Midwest after only two years. When I reported this to Freud he stated bluntly that he was hardly surprised.
Later when I met Dr. Horney in New York on my way back to Chicago, she was very friendly to me and evinced a great deal of interest in my experiences with Freud. Unfortunately, I did not have much time to communicate with her, nor during the remainder of her life did I take the opportunity to discuss Freud in to her own organization founded in 1941. It was natural that I should have had, at that time as a neophyte, the usual Freudian attitude toward the so-called splinter which had separated from the main body of .
Indeed, when I became aware of the serious controversies among psychoanalysts taking place in Chicago later, I experienced about the possibility of the main body of the Chicago Institute into an “orthodox” and a “liberal” group. As I look back now, it would have been far better if such a split along ideological lines had occured, since after Alexander's retirement from Chicago, the forces which he temporarily and successfully controlled, attained power, and Chicago has now only a classical psychoanalytic institute.
As all of you realize, it takes a very long time to become thoroughly educated in any special branch of and probably analytic requires more time than any other scientific or cultural field. The completion of formal education, however, does not make an analyst, for it takes many years to acquire enough analytic experience to the point where one feels at home with mechanisms and defenses. It likewise takes a long time, for that matter much longer, to attain a perspective on the various aspects of analytic theory and its . It took me many years before I could begin to grasp the total gestalt of analysis and the significance of so-called neo-Freudians in the total field.
There are several ways of viewing
- 115 -
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]