Login
Kelman, H. (1966). The Changing Image of Psychoanalysis. Am. J. Psychoanal., 26:169-177.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1966). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 26:169-177

The Changing Image of Psychoanalysis Related Papers

Harold Kelman, M.D. Author Information

Our topic contains terms requiring definition. Implicitly it raises a host of questions. What is an Image? It is a form and a vision. Being a changing image, it is a sequence of patternings emerging from a creating process. That process reflects its context. It delimits what has been appropriate. But, as creative vision, it must point the way toward possible futures. Because “Where there is no vision, the people perish.” (Proverbs, 29:18)

In the brief existence of psychoanalysis no image was or could be final and right. Pressures to stay with the static express fears of the ongoing. Nature is profligate with its abundance of forms. Spontaneity in children is a play of forms, a playing with forms, a delight in their evanescence and their non-attachment to them. Play is an essential to growing, for animal and human life. Forms and forming are integral to the creating process as are play and effort, frustration and realization, lying fallow and rejuvenating. According to ancient Hindu philosophy, attachment to form itself is the greatest sin of all. Human history attests to the validity of this.

New civilizations reflect new visions as responses to challenges (Toynbee). Populations withdrew from what had moved them and returned with new perspectives. They could be open to a new kind of seeing for “The eye can only see that to which it brings the power of seeing:” (Plotinus) They were not fettered to forms, become empty of vital content, statically repetitive

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.