Login
Wenkart, A. (1966). The Changing Image of Psychoanalysis. Am. J. Psychoanal., 26:183-189.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1966). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 26:183-189

The Changing Image of Psychoanalysis Related Papers

Antonia Wenkart, M.D. Author Information

Being-In-The-World

It is unthinkable to conceive of an image of man, and therefore an image of psychoanalysis, at a standstill, in a static state. With the cataclysmic upheavals of the last decades and the rapid changes and progress in natural science, a decisive change in living conditions has come about as well as in our knowledge of man and our ideas regarding mental ills. Hence we will not be surprised at the change in psychoanalytic treatment along with the altered image of psychoanalysis.

Speaking from the platform of the Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis, I am encouraged to question the validity of a few accepted notions. I hope to contribute something to heretofore tenuous assumptions, and sketch in the silhouette of the new image of psychoanalysis.

My first line of questioning is directed toward our holistic approach. What is the “whole”? From the premise of the so-called neo-Freudian approach of the 1920's and the 1930's, this seems appropriate. Freud's genetic view of instincts and the therapeutic achievement of psychoanalysis clearly envisaged human nature as divided into inborn instincts and noninstinctual characteristics. Human existence was divided into inner psychic processes and outer reality. The goal of psychoanalysis was to effect change and adjustment to outer reality.

Then Dr. Horney's ideas about morality of evolution cut across the division. Dr. Horney's concept of the real self not only implied a general and more comprehensive

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.