Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ullman, M. (1967). Discussion. Am. J. Psychoanal., 27(2):184-187.
    

(1967). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27(2):184-187

Discussion

Montague Ullman, M.D.

To read and listen to a paper by Dr. Kelman is an experience in consciousness expansion without the chemical side effects, but with the same feeling of being shook up and left to gaze in wonder at a familiar but very different world. Only someone who combines a little of the artist, a rich sprinkling of the philosopher, something of the scientist who is not caught up in the scientific establishment, and a goodly dose of clinical sensitivity could accomplish this. And I think he has succeeded admirably.

I would like to make three points in this discussion. The first concerns Dr. Kelman's ever so justifiable concern over the problem of getting through to psychoanalytic trainees on the issue of dreams. The second pertains to the richness of the phenomenological approach itself. Third, I would like to discuss the specific application of this approach to the dreams presented and raise what I believe to be some points of difference.

Training

Dr. Kelman has opened up a very important area when he indicates how encumbered psychoanalytic trainees are in their initial attempts to struggle with dreams. The paradox can be simply stated. The student's encounter with the dream as the most compellingly spontaneous, creative kind of datum presented by the patient tends to elicit from the neophyte a kind of response that is very formula ridden, cliché encumbered, and is an appeal to higher authority. The dream is the patient's invitation to the therapist to experience him, the patient, in his uniqueness.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.