Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To receive notifications about new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to receive notifications about new content in PEP Web? For more information about this feature, click here

To sign up to PEP Web Alert for weekly emails with new content updates click click here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Malkin, E.E. (1974). Reich and Rousseau: An Essay in Psycho-History. Am. J. Psychoanal., 34(1):63-72.
   

(1974). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34(1):63-72

Reich and Rousseau: An Essay in Psycho-History

Edward E. Malkin, Ph.D.

One of the most successful mots of popular sophistication — it is heard even on TV detective shows — is ascribed originally to Henry Kissinger: “Even paranoids have enemies.” Had he said, precisely paranoids have enemies, it would have befuddled his listeners, since paranoids are supposed only to have delusions about enemies, and Kissinger knows better than to appear to be more than one step in advance of his interviewers.

The real existence of the enemy is a vital element in the economy of the still-coping paranoid. The enemy is the proof that there is a standard of virtue in the world as well as the evidence of his own innate potency and superiority in the face of the standard (since the enemy will not come out in the open and fight like a man, where everyone can see him). If the enemy does not exist, he will create one, embodying all that the paranoid finds detestable in the human condition, choosing and nurturing him carefully. The enemy is not created out of the whole cloth, but rather under conditions dominated by the paranoid's own internal dynamisms. It is nonetheless true that paranoid thinking is a statement about the external world. The world listens to such statements — often attending more to the tone of voice than to their objective validity — and has ways of replying to them. And the paranoid responds (this time, perhaps silently): Aha! Just as I thought.

Swanson et al. correctly point out the limited usefulness of the nosological dictum of the American Psychiatric Association's Manual of Mental Disorders, according to which the hallmark of the psychotic paranoid is his delusion: “This clearly is too narrow a criterion for paranoid conditions in general; the paranoid personality is not delusional, nor are the subclinical paranoid phenomena which are transiently seen in many individuals.”1 However, the “state of the art” in psychotherapy (in contradistinction to the popular culture) does not permit much assurance in going beyond the A.P.A.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.