|Symonds, M. (1978). The Psychodynamics of Violence-Prone Marriages Martin Symonds. Am. J. Psychoanal., 38:213-222.|
Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.
If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.
If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.
(1978). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 38(3):213-222
The Psychodynamics of Violence-Prone Marriages Martin Symonds
The purpose of this article is to arrive at a psychodynamic understanding of the traits and interpersonal reactions of marital couples which produce the violence-prone marriage—a marriage that can frequently erupt into dramatic and sometimes tragic outburts of violence. The clinical basis for the observations and conclusions presented here come from the author's private practice, his special interest in the of violence and , and from the Clinic Victimology Program, which has been broadened to include victims of family violence, specifically, the battered spouse. The increasing interest in this problem and of many programs to help battered wives indicate that the of marital violence has come “out of the closet” and become available for professional exploration and examination.
Though the majority of reported incidents are those of wife and abuse, an interesting finding has been the uncovering of many incidents of abused and sometimes battered husbands. Langley and Levy cite studies with surprising statistics that indicate little difference in numbers between husbands their wives and wives their husbands. Though it is true that men have been physically abused by their wives, it is the women who have suffered severe and crippling injuries and have been profoundly terrorized by their husbands’ violent .
While the capacity for violent is present in all of us, the expression or even discussion of violence generally makes people uncomfortable. Throughout this paper I will be discussing violence, , and hostility, and although these words are in common usage, they are poorly defined and even used interchangeably, resulting in more confusion. Despite the vast amount of scientific literature on these subjects, I found that I couldn't adequately apply them to my patients’ until I developed clinically useful working definitions of these concepts.
As I use the word, can be violent or nonviolent. is the expression of feelings, the goal of which is to force or control another person's to either submit or comply with one's needs. can be what I have called vertical ; this is standing-up, face-to-face, direct
- 213 -
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]