Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Kavaler-Adler, S. (1993). The Conflict and Process Theory of Melanie Klein. Am. J. Psychoanal., 53:187-204.
    

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

OpenAthens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1993). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 53(3):187-204

The Conflict and Process Theory of Melanie Klein

Susan Kavaler-Adler, Ph.D.

Melanie Klein's theory provides an integrative link between the conflict theory of Freud and the process theory of the British school of object relations, with its emphasis on relational yearnings as the primary motivational force that dominates our psyches. Klein's theory provides an integrative framework for both the conflict and process aspects of the human psyche, which makes it fundamental and unique.

Conflict

Drive truly becomes passion as the churning confusion of love and hate comes to dominate the texture of human psychic experience (see Greenberg and Mitchell. 1983). The primary desire for loving, featured as the major characteristic of human strivings within the theory of all the British object relations theories—being called a drive toward connection by Fairbairn, and “primary love” by Balint—resonates through Klein's theory as the craving for reparative reunion with our primary love in the face of poignantly tormenting thrusts toward hostile aggression that emanate from within us. We fear both that our aggression will annihilate the maternal giver who is the very center of our longings for nurturing and deep modes of sensual care, and that our aggression will meet with retaliation from the mother who can be imagined to be as murderous as our own destructive and combative impulses.

In fantasy, her body is the source of all our deepest wishes for comfort, love, and sexual satiation, yet her power to give from within this body, or from within the rich resources of her breast, can stir such envy within us that anguish and despair must be tolerated in the face of our helplessness to consciously control that which threatens like a tiger within to lunge forth and spoil the source of all goodness. We tear her apart with criticism inside

- 187 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.