When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.
If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Gross, J. Hallerman, B. (1996). On Not Interpreting: The Metaphor of the Baby, Enactment and Transitional Experience, Presenter: Joseph Newirth, Ph.D. Discussant: Douglas Ingram, M.D. October 19, 1995. Am. J. Psychoanal., 56(2):233-234.
(1996). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 56(2):233-234
Scientific Meetings of the Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis
On Not Interpreting: The Metaphor of the Baby, Enactment and Transitional Experience, Presenter: Joseph Newirth, Ph.D. Discussant: Douglas Ingram, M.D. October 19, 1995
Edited by: Joan Gross, C.S.W. and Betsy Hallerman, C.S.W.
What is curative in psychoanalysis? Is change grounded solely in the analytic relationship, as currently espoused in many circles? Or is it based in the more time-honored orientations of ego psychology, interpersonal psychoanalysis, relational conflict theory, or developmental arrest models? And what role does the verbal interpretation serve in facilitating change? Can a noninterpretive stance be mutative?
Joseph Newirth, in his stimulating, provocative, and sensitively drawn paper, attempted to address these questions by drawing from a wealth of theoretical material and a rich case presentation. Newirth argued that the current trend toward relationalism in psychoanalysis reflects a wholesale accommodation of analytic theories that shortchanges the analytical relationship in its failure to provide a developmental framework, particularly with respect to developmental arrest. The thrust of Newirth's position is that developmental arrest has been conceptually misunderstood by proponents of relationalism as pathologizing the patient and ennobling the analyst. In his view, developmental arrest is represented not by a damaged or deprived child in need of compensatory love, but rather by a failure in the capacity for symbolic experience, which is reflected in the patient's sense of the self and the world as concrete, fragile, unstable, and vulnerable to random and unpredictable external forces. The analyst's role, he holds, must be as an “active strategist” in the process of creating the verbal and nonverbal experiences that facilitate the development of the capacity to use symbolic thought.
Referring in large measure to Winnicott's work on the use of such non interpretative approaches as play, enactment, and transitional experiences, Newirth illustrated his position by presenting a case in which he and a patient develop an uninterpreted ritual of sharing a donut (then later a cookie) in each session.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]