|Lachmann, F.M., Lachmann, A. (1996). Ibsen: Criticism, Creativity, and Self-State Transformations. Ann. Psychoanal., 24:187-204.|
Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.
If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.
If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.
(1996). Annual of Psychoanalysis, 24:187-204
Ibsen: Criticism, Creativity, and Self-State Transformations
A measure of a person's is the ability to transcend the slings and arrows of outrageous critics. To be able to form a work of art out of the rubble left by such an attack is, of course, not the only way in which creative abilities can show themselves, but it is one way (for other ways, see, for example, ; ; ). We chose this view of , the capacity to turn a humiliating rebuff into a triumph, for two reasons. First, it has been proposed as a developmental in that it signals one of the of archaic (). Second, it is of particular relevance in providing a glimpse into the creative process of Henrik Ibsen. Specifically, we refer to Ibsen's response to the criticism and rejection of his play Ghosts by An Enemy of the People. In focusing on this view of , we necessarily ignore other factors that contribute to artistic .
To explore how Ibsen transcended his reaction to the devastating reception accorded to Ghosts, we trace the themes addressed in this play and their subsequent in An Enemy of the People. In Ghosts, Ibsen depicted central themes that had been haunting him since , ghosts from the past in their “purest, boldest” form (p. 7). Having so boldly exposed himself, he was in a particularly vulnerable when attacked by his critics and ignored by his readers. In An Enemy of the People, Ibsen depicted his outrage at his critics and formerly loyal public, redressing the narcissistic injury he had sustained. He triumphed over his detractors through a self-restorative solution. He argued for an extreme, defiant, uncompromising stance through which the artist can defy social and withstand ridicule and .
Our thesis is that one function of the creative process is to transform one's depleted self-state in response to a narcissistic injury. We propose that Ibsen's
- 187 -
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]