Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: Downloads should look similar to the originals…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Downloadable content in PDF and ePUB was designed to be read in a similar format to the original articles.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Trosman, H. (1965). Freud and the Controversy Over Shakespearean Authorship. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 13:475-498.

(1965). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 13:475-498

Freud and the Controversy Over Shakespearean Authorship

Harry Trosman, M.D.

SUMMARY

Freud maintained a long-standing fascination with the Shakespearean authorship controversy. After reading J. Thomas Looney's book, "Shakespeare" Identified, in 1923 he became "almost convinced" that Edward de Vere, the seventeenth Earl of Oxford, was the rightful author of the Shakespearean plays and poems.

The Looney book is examined as representative of the anti-Stratfordian

position. The arguments are compared with the position taken by the body of historical and literary scholars who support the "Stratfordian orthodoxy."

Lastly, an attempt is made to examine the controversy psychoanalytically. Some speculations concerning motivation of those who support the anti-Stratfordian position are put forth. Freud's interest in the controversy is seen as the outgrowth of a specific cognitive style and a variant of a family romance fantasy.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.