Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see statistics of the Most Popular Journal Articles on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Statistics of the Most Popular Journal Articles on PEP-Web can be reviewed at any time. Just click the “See full statistics” link located at the end of the Most Popular Journal Articles list in the PEP Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ritvo, L.B. (1965). Darwin as the Source of Freud's Neo-Lamarckianism. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 13:499-517.

(1965). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 13:499-517

Darwin as the Source of Freud's Neo-Lamarckianism

Lucille B. Ritvo

"FREUD'S Lamarckian propensities" were, according to Ernst Kris (31), "much regretted by many of us." Freud's neo-Lamarckian statements do indeed sound anachronistic in the light not only of modern biological findings but also of Freud's early, enduring, and knowledgeable enthusiasm for Darwin. As early as his high school days Freud (23) found that "the theories of Darwin, which were then of topical interest, strongly attracted me, for they held out hope of an extraordinary advance in our understanding of the world" (p. 8).

Freud's highly successful preanalytic work in science was almost exclusively along evolutionary lines at a time when evolutionary concepts were still highly controversial, even among biologists. A conspicuous exception is the only scientific work in which Freud mentions Lamarck; Freud's nonevolutionary work on coca refers to a 1783 paper on coca by Lamarck. In medical school Freud took Claus's elective course on "Darwin and Biology" and chose to work with the two men who had reputations as Darwinians, Carl Claus and Ernst Wilhelm von Brücke. By the time Freud turned to the treatment of hysteria he was thoroughly trained and experienced in the application of all aspects of evolutionary theory, phylogenetic, ontogenetic, and functional, and had contributed evidence for the support of Darwin's theory (36).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.