Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To copy parts of an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To copy a phrase, paragraph, or large section of an article, highlight the text with the mouse and press Ctrl + C. Then to paste it, go to your text editor and press Ctrl + V.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Wallerstein, R.S. (1967). A. Development and Metapsychology of the Defense Organization of the Ego. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 15:130-149.

(1967). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 15:130-149

A. Development and Metapsychology of the Defense Organization of the Ego

Robert S. Wallerstein, M.D.

This panel was one of two anniversary panels constituted to commemorate the thirtieth anniversary of The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense by Anna Freud. Panel B marked the occasion by concerning itself with the implications of this historic landmark for the continuing development of psychoanalysis as technique and as therapy; this panel devoted itself to a reconsideration of the defense organization of the ego from the metapsychological points of view, in the light of the theoretical developments in psychoanalysis in the intervening thirty years.

Jacob Arlow opened with a brief historical perspective on The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense, set in the context of a survey of the concept of defenses and of defense mechanisms in the development of psychoanalytic theory. He stated that Anna Freud's book was the logical culmination of a long process of reorganization of both psychoanalytic theory and practice that took place in the 1920s and the early 1930s in the publications of Sigmund Freud. Some, therefore, saw nothing especially new in it. Others, on the contrary, saw this book as a radical and definitive departure from the unremitting psychology of the psychic depths that psychoanalysis had, earlier, monolithically represented.

Arlow read from some of the reviews of this book which appeared in the psychoanalytic journals at the time. Otto Fenichel emphasized that the major contribution of this new book was in its convincing demonstration that psychoanalytic (ego) psychology, even when it investigates the psychic surface, remains nonetheless a depth psychology.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.