Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To copy parts of an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To copy a phrase, paragraph, or large section of an article, highlight the text with the mouse and press Ctrl + C. Then to paste it, go to your text editor and press Ctrl + V.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Holzman, P.S. (1987). Reply to Michael F. Basch. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:1011-1012.
    

(1987). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 35:1011-1012

Reply to Michael F. Basch Related Papers

Philip S. Holzman, Ph.D.

September 11, 1986

Michael Basch takes strong objection to my statement that Heinz Kohut and the self psychology school "insist that the methods of psychoanalysis are those of intuition, introspection, and empathy," but he reserves his dudgeon only for my having linked intuition with introspection and empathy. I accept the correction that Kohut did not use the word "intuition" in describing his method, and that he went to some length to distinguish empathy from intuition. But my acceptance of this correction in no way invalidates the points I made in my article.

I argued that if one limits the psychoanalytic enterprise to the methods of introspection and empathy (I omit here the term "intuition," with no change in the argument), one eliminates the possibility to confirm or disconfirm most of its assertions. While I may have been textually incorrect in coupling empathy and introspection with intuition, I believe the logic of my argument is correct. By claiming introspection and empathy as the exclusive psychoanalytic methods, Kohut placed psychoanalysis squarely with the hermeneutic movement.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.