Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see the German word that Freud used to refer to a concept…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to know the exact German word that Freud used to refer to a psychoanalytic concept? Move your mouse over a paragraph while reading The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud and a window will emerge displaying the text in its original German version.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Fonagy, P. (1996). Commentaries. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44:404-422.

(1996). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 44:404-422


Peter Fonagy

When someone of the distinction of Peter Wolff addresses a body of research, all those who are intellectually committed to that field had better take notice. As a great admirer of Wolff's contributions over the years, it is a special pleasure for me to comment on the arguments in his paper. His critique echoes that of other psychoanalysts (most particularly André Green, 1995, but see also Fajardo, 1993) and is therefore appropriately designated as a target article for this issue of the Journal.

The status of developmental propositions in the definition of psychoanalysis. When Sandler and Joffe (1969) summarized the core assumptions of the basic psychoanalytic model, they included the following: (1) psychic determinism; (2) the pleasure-unpleasure principle; (3) the nature of the biological organism; (4) the dynamic unconscious; and (5) genetic-developmental propositions. The last of these items is the idea that all behaviors are understandable as sequences of actions developing out of earlier (or even earliest infantile) events. It is undoubtedly the case that Freud's view throughout his life was that pathology recapitulated ontogeny (see, e.g., Freud, 1905). Fenichel (1945), for example, stated explicitly that psychoanalytic understanding of early development had substantially advanced as a byproduct of studies of the psychoses, particularly schizophrenia. It should not surprise us therefore that Freud recognized child observation as a legitimate epistemic strategy.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.