Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:


  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Beldoch, M. (1996). Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science, And Psychoanalysis. By Richard Webster. New York: Basic Books, 1995, 673 pp., $35.00.. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44:587-593.

(1996). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 44:587-593

Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science, And Psychoanalysis. By Richard Webster. New York: Basic Books, 1995, 673 pp., $35.00.

Review by:
Michael Beldoch

Richard Webster is far from the first student of English literature to attempt to expose Freud's psychoanalysis as failed. He believes, however, that Freud is a different kind of modern day emperor, not exactly without any clothes on at all, but rather with hidden priestly robes barely discernible under his manifest white coat. For not only is psychoanalysis a pseudoscience, it is essentially and merely a version of traditional Judeo-Christian religion.

Webster compares Freud with Jesus and St. Paul, with God, with Moses, and often derides him as the Messiah who will not come. “In view of the accumulating mass of trenchant criticism which has appeared during the past two decades it might well seem that the case against Freud has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt. … yet this is far from being the case” (p. 25). Webster makes it crystal clear from the very outset of this long, tendentious book that his attempt will not be like those of any before him: “It is true that if I did not believe that Freud could be unseated, and unseated in an even more comprehensive and conclusive manner than he has been yet, I would not have thrown down my gauntlet in quite this way.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.