Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).
Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.
Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Pollack, A. (1996). The Rhetorical Voice Of Psychoanalysis: Displacement Of Evidence By Theory. By Donald P. Spence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1994, 228 pp., $32.00.. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44:976-981.
(1996). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 44:976-981
The Rhetorical Voice Of Psychoanalysis: Displacement Of Evidence By Theory. By Donald P. Spence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1994, 228 pp., $32.00.
Review by: Alan Pollack
Donald Spence's latest book is a blistering condemnation of psychoanalytic discourse. Much of it is valid and compelling, but much is unfair. If one filters out the rhetorical voice of Donald Spence, the basic message is straightforward: to become a true science, psychoanalysis must develop a public database and a tradition of empirical investigation. It must formulate operational hypotheses, testable on data freely available to all, and subject its methods and findings to the adversarial process of critique and replication. Short of this, the wisdom of psychoanalysis cannot be converted into objectively validated knowledge, its truths cannot be reliably extracted from its theories.
Many previous writers have offered similar advice. Analysts, beginning with Freud, have often expressed optimism that provisional propositions will be refined steadily by clinical data. In Spence's view, however, the traditions of psychoanalysis actively subvert the emergence of a truly scientific attitude and the establishment of reliable theory. Our theories, he claims, are hopelessly muddled by subjectivity, and our reasoning fallacious, self-serving, and reverential.
Spence applies two major intellectual tools for his dissection of analytic discourse. The first is a distinction drawn from the philosophy of science, between Galilean and Aristotelian science. Galilean science is characterized as empiricist, modern, inductive, and democratic. Aristotelian science is contrastingly described as conceptualist, medieval, occult, and elitist.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]