Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hirsch, I. (1996). Object Relations Theories And Psychopathology: A Comprehensive Text. By Frank Summers. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 1994, 408 pp., $45.00.. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44:1257-1261.

(1996). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 44:1257-1261

Object Relations Theories And Psychopathology: A Comprehensive Text. By Frank Summers. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 1994, 408 pp., $45.00.

Review by:
Irwin Hirsch

Frank Summers sets out to take an in-depth look at the variety of theories and theorists he distinguishes as falling under the rubric of object relations. His talent as a writer is considerable, and given the density and complexity of the material, his work is quite readable, while also maintaining a high level of theoretical and clinical sophistication. In addition to his integrative introductory and concluding chapters, Summers explores in fine detail the work of Ronald Fairbairn and Harry Guntrip, Melanie Klein, D. W. Winnicott, Otto Kernberg, Heinz Kohut, and the interpersonal school. He divides each theory into subsections: the structure of personality; development; psychopathology; and therapy. Each theory and theorist is compared and contrasted with the others, in all of these dimensions. Every chapter, however, can also stand alone for a reader who is interested in a particular point of view. The reader leaves each chapter well informed about the subject matter, though the author does seem to grasp the full implications of some perspectives more than others.

Throughout the volume Summers contrasts his view of object relations theories with what he refers to as the “drive-ego” model of classical theory. He does not speak of the various object relations theories as exactly the same as one another but as having certain key commonalities. With respect to personality structure, the internal self is a function of internalized object relations. The “self,” in contrast to “ego,” consists of internalized object relations units.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.