Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To share an article on social media…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you find an article or content on PEP-Web interesting, you can share it with others using the Social Media Button at the bottom of every page.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Bachant, J.L., Adler, E. (1997). Transference: Co-Constructed Or Brought To The Interaction?. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 45:1097-1120.
    

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

OpenAthens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1997). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 45:1097-1120

Transference: Co-Constructed Or Brought To The Interaction?

Janet Lee Bachant and Elliot Adler

Contemporary understandings of transference diverge around the issue of whether transference is co-constructed by both parties to the analytic interaction or brought to it by each participant. Examining the evolution of the concept of transference distills some of the issues inherent in this controversy. It is suggested that each of these conceptualizations contributes something essential to the development of a broader picture of the way transference functions in the clinical setting. If transference is viewed as a process operating along a continuum of repression, both co-construction of the interaction and the primitive wishes, fears, and fantasies brought to the interaction can be parsimoniously accounted for. Adaptive and archaic transference activity are distinguished, and the two dimensions of transference, dynamically interconnected, are shown to be essential aspects of analytic understanding.

Alongside resistance, unconscious fantasy, compromise formation, and defense, transference stands as a nucleus of psychoanalytic thinking about technique. It is especially prized for its ability to crystallize the meaning of current patterns of interaction, as well as for its

—————————————

Janet Lee Bachant is a Senior Supervisor, faculty member, and Training Analyst, Psychoanalytic Institute of the Postgraduate Center for Mental Health, and faculty member, Westchester Center for the Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. Elliot Adler is a Training Analyst and Senior Supervisor, Psychoanalytic Institute of the Postgraduate Center for Mental Health, and faculty member and Supervisor, Westchester Center for the Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy.

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the March 2, 1997, meeting of Division 39, American Psychological Association, Denver; the March 25, 1997, scientific meeting of the New York Psychoanalytic Association; and the May 17, 1997, meeting of the American Psychoanalytic Association. The authors thank Leon Kupferstein and Howard Levine for their thoughtful and stimulating discussions of the paper, and Jacob Arlow, Ken Barish, Peter Buirski, Arthur Lynch, Leo Rangell, and Arnold Richards for reading and critically commenting on earlier drafts. Submitted for publication June 1, 1996.

- 1097 -

capacity to uncover the perpetually active unconscious wishes and fears from childhood that continue to organize experience. Acknowledged as a central dynamic force within the psychoanalytic situation since Freud's postscript to the Dora case (1905), this concept has generated an enormous and continually expanding literature. Burgeoning discussion among analysts of different theoretical persuasions is currently stimulating creative reformulations and innovative approaches to understanding the process of transference. Many of the most salient issues in this controversy converge on the question of whether transference is better conceived as co-constructed in the analytic situation or brought to the analytic interaction by the patient.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.