Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To report problems to PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Help us improve PEP Web. If you find any problem, click the Report a Problem link located at the bottom right corner of the website.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Akhtar, S. (2002). Editor's Introduction: The Social Context of Addiction. J. Appl. Psychoanal. Stud., 4(4):445-446.

(2002). Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 4(4):445-446

Introduction: Book Review and Commentary

Editor's Introduction: The Social Context of Addiction

Review by:
Salman Akhtar

In an aphoristic statement made early during his career, Freud declared masturbation to be the “primal addiction” (1897, p. 287). In doing so, he hinted at all the essential features of the malady in Zen-like simplicity. These features, of course, are (i) a narcissistic orientation, (ii) turning away from deep object relations, (iii) manipulation of the body, and (iv) replacement of genital sexual pleasure by a regressive pregenital satisfaction.

Freud's ideas were elaborated by subsequent analysts using different vantage points on the human psyche. From the drive theory perspective, addiction was correlated with oral dependency and regression from genital to masturbatory pleasure (Abraham, 1908; Knight, 1937; Fenichel, 1945). From the ego psychology perspective, affect primitivization, the ego's vulnerability to regressive solutions, use of denial, lack of self-governance, and predominance of primitive defenses were implicated (Rado, 1933; Krystal and Raskin, 1970; Mack, 1981). From the object relations viewpoint, a borderline character organization (Kernberg, 1967) and loss of transitional relatedness were regarded as major features. Finally, from the self psychology perspective addiction was seen as a failure of self-regulation (Levin, 1987; Keller, 1992). While not ignoring the role of oedipal factors, almost all authors conclude that the “fundamental wound of the addict's ego” (Simmel, 1948, p. 27) was caused by early, preoedipal damage to the personality. At the same time, they acknowledged the role of social variables and constitutional vulnerabilities, which perhaps explains the fact that not all individuals with preoedipal ego damage develop addiction.

This intrapsychic emphasis while immensely important needs enrichment from the external sociocultural vantage point. After all, addiction occurs in the setting of an anguished and broken heart but also of economic hardship, peer pressure, loneliness, and vulnerability to seductions of advertising, drug trafficking, and industry-related shenanigans of all sorts. In this issue, we add to the literature on the social context of addiction.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.