Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Yorke, C. (1985). Diagnostic Thinking about a Boyhood Disturbance. Bul. Anna Freud Centre, 8(3):195-211.

(1985). Bulletin of the Anna Freud Centre, 8(3):195-211

Diagnostic Thinking about a Boyhood Disturbance

Clifford Yorke

Introduction

It is not always recognized that Anna Freud had reservations about the use of her diagnostic profile schema (1962). In particular, she was afraid that the schema would be used as a questionnaire and filled in accordingly. She would sometimes become ominously silent when a diagnostician attempted to make lengthy statements about such matters as a child's narcissism in the absence of any information on which to base an opinion. In her view, the profile was simply a guide to psychoanalytic diagnosis and to diagnostic thinking about a case. She often pointed out that, in many child referrals, the diagnosticians were faced with a mixture of parental prejudice, childhood reluctance, and psychological-test material which, certainly in the young, was not always very reliable. Even under the best conditions, a psychoanalytic diagnosis was tentative and provisional; and she disliked the fact that the profile sometimes prompted people to move from legitimate speculation to unjustified guesswork.

Anna Freud thought deeply about every case coming to the Centre for diagnosis; she had often reached some kind of formulation before she listened to a profile; and she did not think in headings. The profile is a useful way of ordering initial data and subsequent inferences about a case, but the bulk of the psychoanalytic thinking needs to be done before a profile is made. The schema headings may certainly stimulate further thoughts and often draw attention to aspects of the child's development and personality of which nothing, or very little, may be known at that stage.

The psychoanalytic assessment which follows was presented at a diagnostic meeting in the narrative form it takes here. It sprang from a policy which strove to discourage the automatic use of headings as organizers of thought. Certainly a profile format can be discerned, especially in the section on metapsychology.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.