Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To search for a specific phrase…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you write an article’s title and the article did not appear in the search results? Or do you want to find a specific phrase within the article? Go to the Search section and write the title or phrase surrounded by quotations marks in the “Search for Words or Phrases in Context” area.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hinshelwood, B. (1984). Editorial. Brit. J. Psychother., 1(1):3-5.

(1984). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 1(1):3-5

Editorial

Bob Hinshelwood

There should have been a journal for psychotherapists long before now.

One can only speculate on the reasons why we have not had one. It must be to do with the fragmented state of the profession, with numerous separate trainings based on established theoretical positions; leading to more trainings trying eclectically to bridge the theoretical positions.

All this separateness creates group dynamics within the profession that polarises individuals and organisations into positions increasingly distant from each other. Is there something in the nature of the work, or in the kinds of professional anxieties it throws up, that generates this splitting?

However, the appearance of this Journal is not a miraculous circus act, juggling all the disparate interests into one swaying edifice of acrobats. It comes at a time when there is suddenly a wide recognition of the need to establish some common principles.

Thus this Journal represents the willingness of the majority of psychotherapy training organisations (the Institute of Psychoanalysis, and the Jungian Society have their own journals) to come together. This willingness appears in other activities as well - for instance the “Rugby” Conference.

It is consistent with our split profession that this first issue carries two articles on the contemporary issue of stereotyped gender roles. Joan Raphael-Leff explores the contribution of psycho-analysis to actually creating mythical beliefs about the role of women. She shows how, with these cultural stereotypes, mothers deal with their position through two general modes of internal adjustment.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.