Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To receive notifications about new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to receive notifications about new content in PEP Web? For more information about this feature, click here

To sign up to PEP Web Alert for weekly emails with new content updates click click here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Perry., C. (1985). Commentary by an Analytical Psychologist. Brit. J. Psychother., 1(4):291-292.

(1985). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 1(4):291-292

Commentary by an Analytical Psychologist Related Papers

Christopher Perry.

Reading through this session, I was struck again and again by a lifeless quality both in the material and in the patient's response to his therapist's interventions. The lifelessness, together with the history, led me to the following tentative formulation. The patient is a twenty-nine year old man who has survived repeated experiences of rejection, separation and loss throughout his childhood and adolescence by developing a do-it-yourself approach to life and by functioning mainly in his head. His ego strength is manifested in his capacity to hold down a highly competitive job and to control and manipulate others; but the ego is also deformed in so far as the patient cannot relate. Relatedness or giros has been replaced in him by a ruthless power, just as his deep wish to opt out for a more relaxing and supportive way of life seems to have been defended against by his striving at work. The history and treatment background are peppered with the language of sadomasochism -‘bruising’, ‘scourging’, ‘touch regime’, ‘harsh’, ‘violently rejected’ - reflecting, I imagine, a kind of transference, countertransference dynamic in which the patient is barricading himself up against the therapist, exerting maximal control and recreating the cold, mechanical ambience of the mother-infant relationship.

The patient believes that he can only be brought alive from outside, possibly by anal rape (e.g. ‘need a lot of stimulus from without’), but I wonder whether the anality is a smokescreen for a deep longing and hunger.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.