Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hinshelwood, B. (1987). Editorial. Brit. J. Psychother., 4(2):125.

(1987). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 4(2):125

Editorial

Bob Hinshelwood

Nina Coltart's public lecture from last May is published here at last. The time that articles take to get into printed form is unpleasantly long. The various stages from submission publication takes mostly about a year or more. The sedate process of assessment, requiring busy people to comment in detail on the papers, is exacerbated by the build up of those that are eventually agreed as suitable, which then have to wait their turn. To deal with the accumulating material, we have increased the size of the Journal. As you may have noticed each issue is mostly around 100 pages long, however there is a limit to the size since production costs at the printer are 70% of all costs, and each additional page costs some £ 100. So, the assessment of suitability of papers is an increasingly important task of the editorial group and advisors. The policy has been to establish a broad range of material: from the solidly thought-out discussion such as Nina Coltart's paper to the adventurously unusual like Bertram Karon's inspirational look at how to make the treatment of the acute schizophrenic easy! It has been important also to make the Journal a vehicle for comparative study of different approaches to psychotherapy. The Clinical Commentaries have been the single most appreciated series; and we have been running a series on theoretical concepts as seen from different points of view - the series on narcissism finishes now and we are starting one on the mind of the infant which will include 4-5 contributions from various views.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.