Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hinshelwood, B. (1988). Editorial. Brit. J. Psychother., 4(3):217.

(1988). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 4(3):217

Editorial

Bob Hinshelwood

The making of a therapist is one of the most complex accomplishments of human culture - it takes another therapist to hone the personality of the trainee into a fine tool. Or does it? Norman Macaskill reviews the balance of evidence in the literature. The complex, and in some ways contradictory, picture suggests there are many factors and some of these must be to do with the quality of the training therapist's work, the personality of the trainee, and various aspects of the interaction of therapist with patient. The negotiation of anxiety between the therapist and the patient, a topic of intense scientific and anxious interest in recent years, is captured in Marie-Christine Reguis's personal account of suffering her training. The anxiety of the psychotherapeutic situation is not, of course, confined to the patient, nor are the therapeutic benefits. The therapist's task is to turn the anxiety to benefit - not only in the winning of an essay prize, but in engaging the patient in a process of change.

Herbert Hahn describes the arduous process of engagement, simple enough in the sophisticated and leafy suburbs of north-west London. But, out there beyond the M25, where the maps say merely ‘there be dragons’, there are also therapists and they are engaging with patients. The capacity to meet a patient is the engaging of one unconscious with another. Do patients unconsciously know what to expect from interpretive understanding? - or do they need conscious induction into what to expect? I suppose it must be something of both, and we normally look to childhood and infancy to find a model for this kind of interactive contact that must happen unconsciously, intuitively.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.