Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size?  In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+).  Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out).   To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command  on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Golan, G. Rosenhein, E. Jaffe, Y. (1988). Humour in Psychotherapy. Brit. J. Psychother., 4(4):393-400.

(1988). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 4(4):393-400

Humour in Psychotherapy

Gabriel Golan, M.A., Eliyahu Rosenhein and Yoram Jaffe

Utilisation of humour by psychotherapists attracts increased interest. While the constructive and untoward potential of the use of humour in therapy has been discussed in the clinical literature, the issue has hardly been investigated empirically. The present study explored the reactions of patients to therapist interventions which employed humorous as compared to nonhumorous control reactions. The sample consisted of 60 female patients, of three personality types: obsessive, hysterical and depressive. They were asked to rate on 8-point scales twelve simulated, tape-recorded therapist interventions of three functional categories: anxiety reduction, perspective building and emotional confrontation. The results indicated a persistent preference for the nonhumorous over the humorous intervention. Statistical analysis revealed no main effects of either personality type or kind of humour, but these two variables were shown to interact significantly in determining the extent of preference for the nonhumorous over the humorous communications. Analysis of open-ended responses indicated more ambivalent attitudes toward the use of humour by patients. The implications of the findings for therapeutic theory and practice are discussed.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.