Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use Evernote for note taking…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Evernote is a general note taking application that integrates with your browser. You can use it to save entire articles, bookmark articles, take notes, and more. It comes in both a free version which has limited synchronization capabilities, and also a subscription version, which raises that limit. You can download Evernote for your computer here. It can be used online, and there’s an app for it as well.

Some of the things you can do with Evernote:

  • Save search-result lists
  • Save complete articles
  • Save bookmarks to articles

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Coles, P. (1988). The Limits of Interpretation: What's Wrong with Psychoanalysis? by Peter Lomas. Published by Penguin Books Ltd, 1987; £3.95 paperback.. Brit. J. Psychother., 4(4):450.

(1988). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 4(4):450

Book Reviews

The Limits of Interpretation: What's Wrong with Psychoanalysis? by Peter Lomas. Published by Penguin Books Ltd, 1987; £3.95 paperback.

Review by:
Prophecy Coles

As the title of this book indicates, Peter Lomas thinks that there is something wrong with the way that psychoanalysts conduct psychoanalysis. And he goes on to ask some interesting philosophical questions about the nature of the analytic enterprise: ‘What do we mean when we say an interpretation is true?’ and ‘Can a psychotherapist manage without a theory?’. However his answers to these questions seem less satisfactory. He begins by saying that ‘we cannot help seeking to influence others in favour of our dearest beliefs, but we can try and limit this influence and be aware of the subtle ways in which it is achieved’. This position leads him on to suggest ways in which we can try to lessen this influence. He is critical of Freudian theory for he believes it perpetuates a paternalistic power struggle, while at the same time he thinks that ‘the place of Freudian interpretation in therapy with patients is more limited in scope than psychoanalysts maintain’. His view is that ‘the business of helping patients has much more in common with ordinary living than is usually thought’. He gives some clinical vignettes of this ordinary living with patients. He cites a case in which a timid patient asks if she can use his lavatory and he replies, ‘Yes, of course’. He says, ‘My answer was designed to enable someone very unsure of herself, to feel her behaviour was acceptable. By contrast an interpretation might have made her feel criticised’.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.