Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Calvo-Sotelo, J.C. (1988). Babies as Guinea Pigs. Brit. J. Psychother., 4(4):456-457.

(1988). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 4(4):456-457

Babies as Guinea Pigs

Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo

As an independent psychologist and psychotherapist partly trained in London I am not totally unfamiliar with the opinions of some of the contributors to your Journal and would like to raise the issue of the ethics of abortion following on the very comprehensive review of research on the cognitive skills of newborn and unborn babies by D Chamberlain (Vol. 4 (1), pp. 30-71).

It was this kind of evidence plus my own pleasure and interest in living with babies which led me to conclude that the popular and ‘scientific’ (Psychoanalytic, Paediatric, Behaviourist, Piagetian) perception of babies seriously impoverished and degraded them and led to harmful advice on child-rearing. Further, this re-humanisation of babies extends back into the life of the unborn (Laing, Leboyer, Janov, Lake, Liedloff etc) and forced me to revise my ‘liberal’ and ‘feminist’ position on abortion. Others, like Dr N Nathanson, a pioneer of legal abortion in the States, had followed the same logic before me. Yet, my personal experience is that most young psychotherapists adopt the usual ‘liberal’ line on abortion which is often based on the view of the foetus as a mere ‘lump of jelly’, an ‘appendix’ of the mother's body and therefore deprived of any right to a separate personhood. Writers like Vermy and Laing, who are well aware of the continuity and humanity of life before and after birth, tend to adopt an ostrichlike position when it comes to abortion for fear, I guess, of appearing ‘conservative’, ‘intolerant’ or ‘anti-feminist’.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.