Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To copy parts of an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To copy a phrase, paragraph, or large section of an article, highlight the text with the mouse and press Ctrl + C. Then to paste it, go to your text editor and press Ctrl + V.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Fonagy, P. (1989). On the Integration of Cognitive-Behaviour Theory with Psychoanalysis. Brit. J. Psychother., 5(4):557-563.

(1989). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 5(4):557-563

On the Integration of Cognitive-Behaviour Theory with Psychoanalysis

Peter Fonagy

We are very far from the day when we will be able to specify the appropriate mixture of therapeutic approaches to be applied to a single patient (i.e. fitting the patient to the therapy). A commitment to eclectic or multi-modal psychotherapy is gaining ground within the discipline of psychotherapy (London 1972, Lazarus 1981, Goldfried 1982, Messer 1986). The mildest form that such integration may take is the differential therapy-oriented diagnosis of an individual patient. Implicitly the diagnostician conceives of certain patients as suffering from disorders which are oriented towards cognitive therapy whilst others have ‘deeper’ psychotherapeutically based problems. In this vein Murray (1976), for example, asserted that symptoms such as circumscribed phobias or specific sexual dysfunctions arise out of traumatic events and exist within a ‘sound personality structure’. Murray further claims that hysteria and obsessivecompulsive neurosis constitute disorders where symptoms are aspects of underlying personality disorder, ego functioning is fragile, inter-personal problems are prominent and an in-depth dynamic approach is more appropriate. Similiar suggestions have been made by Marks and Gelder (1966), Woody (1968), Marmor (1971), Bowers (1980) Messer and Winokur (1980, 1984, 1986). Ann Douglas' paper in the last issue of the Journal is a further example of this distinguished tradition.

One can well understand the motivation behind this approach, the wish of the clinician with integrity to help each patient with the most powerful technique conceivably applicable to the person's problems as formulated by the therapist.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.