Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: You can request more content in your language…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Would you like more of PEP’s content in your own language?  We encourage you to talk with your country’s Psychoanalytic Journals and tell them about PEP Web.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Pokorny, M.R. (1990). United Kingdom Standing Conference for Psychotherapy. Brit. J. Psychother., 7(2):206-207.

(1990). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 7(2):206-207

United Kingdom Standing Conference for Psychotherapy

Michael R Pokorny

As you will see from this newsletter, we have had a busy time since January, and there is no sign of the pace slackening. After a preliminary meeting with Graham Bright MP and Stanley Clinton-Davis the scheduled meeting with the Minister took place and we are now dealing with the letter written to Graham Bright about that meeting. The day before that meeting, I went to the Department of Health to meet the civil servant who advises the Minister and had a meeting which was friendly enough on the surface, but was rather tense and difficult. His basic question was; why should he consider all the varieties of psychotherapy that we represent, rather than sticking to a few well-known brands? We shall answer this in our reply to the Minister's letter. Part of the Council's response is a decision to set up an Audit Sub-Committee which will keep us informed about research in psychotherapy and will initiate a plan for ongoing audit of our members.

I attended the meeting at the House of Commons where the new Minister, Stephen Dorrell, talked to the Parliamentary Group for Complementary Medicine. I was able to get him to confirm that in order to achieve recognition a group should represent the majority of practitioners in the field and should have a coherent policy. This puts emphasis on our need to stick together if we are to achieve recognition as the professional body for psychotherapy.

Dorothy Hamilton and I had a further meeting with Graham Bright and Lord Clinton-Davis in July at which we roughed out a policy for further action and a reply to the ministerial letter.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.